Masters v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Masters v. Hartman

148 A.D.2d 683, 540 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 148 A.D.2d 683 (Masters v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Masters v. Hartman, 148 A.D.2d 683, 540 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and a violation of 42 USC § 1983, the defendant Howard Hartman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated June 2, 1988, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that there are triable issues of fact regarding the allegations in the complaint, thereby precluding summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety as against [684]*684the appellant. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and a violation of 42 USC § 1983, the defendant Howard Hartman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated June 2, 1988, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that there are triable issues of fact regarding the allegations in the complaint, thereby precluding summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety as against [684]*684the appellant. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 A.D.2d 683, 540 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masters-v-hartman-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack