Masters v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Masters v. Hartman

148 A.D.2d 683, 540 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and a violation of 42 USC § 1983, the defendant Howard Hartman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated June 2, 1988, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that there are triable issues of fact regarding the allegations in the complaint, thereby precluding summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety as against [684] the appellant. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for malicious prosecution, false arrest, and a violation of 42 USC § 1983, the defendant Howard Hartman appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated June 2, 1988, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that there are triable issues of fact regarding the allegations in the complaint, thereby precluding summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety as against [684] the appellant. Lawrence, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Masters v. Hartman, 148 A.D.2d 683, 540 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

148 A.D.2d 683 (Masters v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related