Masters v. Diamond Tel Leasing

536 So. 2d 400, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 11008, 1989 WL 1332
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 12, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2063
StatusPublished

This text of 536 So. 2d 400 (Masters v. Diamond Tel Leasing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Masters v. Diamond Tel Leasing, 536 So. 2d 400, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 11008, 1989 WL 1332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Tucker v. Rudnianyn, 517 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). But also see Carter v. Cerezo, 495 So.2d 202 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

COWART and DANIEL, JJ., concur. SHARP, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tucker v. Rudnianyn
517 So. 2d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Carter v. Cerezo
495 So. 2d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 So. 2d 400, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 11008, 1989 WL 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masters-v-diamond-tel-leasing-fladistctapp-1989.