Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co.

765 So. 2d 1055, 2000 La. LEXIS 2138, 2000 WL 968911
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 30, 2000·No. No. 2000-C-1330·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Ford Motor Co.; — Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 30,152; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 32,275-CA.

Granted. Although the court of appeal correctly found the district court erred in excluding Randy Rainwater’s statement, the court of appeal erred in conducting a de novo review of the record in this case, where a view of the witnesses is essential to a fair resolution of conflicting evidence. See Jones v. Black, 95-2530 (La.6/28/96), 676 So.2d 1067; Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co., 388 So.2d 707 (La.1980). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal on rehearing is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court for a new trial, at which time the statement of Mr. Rainwater should be admitted.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co., 765 So. 2d 1055, 2000 La. LEXIS 2138, 2000 WL 968911 (La. 2000).

765 So. 2d 1055 (Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chatman v. Southern University at New Orleans
197 So. 3d 366 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
Abney v. Smith
35 So. 3d 279 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)