Masterobjects, Inc. v. Google Inc.
This text of Masterobjects, Inc. v. Google Inc. (Masterobjects, Inc. v. Google Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
MASTEROBJECTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GOOGLE INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2014-1148 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-01054-PJH, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
SPENCER HOSIE, Hosie Rice LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DIANE SUE RICE and GEORGE F. BISHOP. Of counsel on the brief were LESLIE V. PAYNE, NATHAN J. DAVIS and ALDEN G. HARRIS, Heim, Payne & Chorush, LLP, of Houston, Texas.
DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, of Phoenix, Ari- zona, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel on the brief were JEFFREY J. TONEY, JONATHAN K. WALDROP and DARCY L. JONES, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia; and STEVEN C. CARLSON and ROBERT P. WATKINS, III, of Redwood Shores, California. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, PLAGER, and MOORE, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Masterobjects, Inc. v. Google Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masterobjects-inc-v-google-inc-cafc-2014.