Master Waterproofers, Inc. v. Auserehl & Son Contracting Corp.

33 Misc. 2d 440, 215 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3110

This text of 33 Misc. 2d 440 (Master Waterproofers, Inc. v. Auserehl & Son Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Master Waterproofers, Inc. v. Auserehl & Son Contracting Corp., 33 Misc. 2d 440, 215 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s proposed case contains all of the evidence, exhibits and other matter necessary or material to a determination of the sole question of law to be raised upon the [441]*441appeal. It was, therefore, error to require the inclusion in the-case on appeal of all the testimony taken during, a five-day trial.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Concur — Hecht, J. P., IIofstadter and Gold, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 2d 440, 215 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/master-waterproofers-inc-v-auserehl-son-contracting-corp-nyappterm-1961.