Master Sergeant George C. Baker v. Major General John G. Waggener, and Honorable Martin Hoffman, Secretary of the Army

539 F.2d 1196, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7425
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 25, 1976·No. 75-1883·Published

Opinion

*1197 PER CURIAM.

This case raises the issue as to whether a noncommissioned officer of the United States Army, who has been discharged “for the convenience of the Government” pursuant to Paragraph 5-3, Army Regulation 635-200, may seek a preliminary injunction in the District Court staying his discharge prior to the exhaustion of administrative remedies. The District Court held that he may not under the circumstances of this case, and we affirm. Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549 (8th Cir. 1975). See Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 94 S.Ct. 937, 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Master Sergeant George C. Baker v. Major General John G. Waggener, and Honorable Martin Hoffman, Secretary of the Army, 539 F.2d 1196, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7425 (8th Cir. 1976).

539 F.2d 1196 (Master Sergeant George C. Baker v. Major General John G. Waggener, and Honorable Martin Hoffman, Secretary of the Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sampson v. Murray
415 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1974)