MASTER PLASTER, INC. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.
This text of 26 So. 3d 47 (MASTER PLASTER, INC. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MASTER PLASTER, INC., Appellant,
v.
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin and R. Hugh Lumpkin and Christine A. Gudaitis and Randall S. Goldberg, Miami, for appellant.
Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer and Hinda Klein, Hollywood, for appellee.
Boyle & Gentile and Mark A. Boyle, Ft. Myers, for National Association of Home Builders, The Florida Home Builders Association, United Policyholders, Aubuchon Homes, Inc., Barnard Construction Co., Inc., Bollenback Builders, Inc., Boran Craig Barber Homes, Inc., Camden Developers, Inc., Civitest Construction Corp., Continental Construction of SW Florida, Inc., Keenan, Hopkins, Schmidt & Stowell Contractors, Inc., Mark Maconi Homes of Tampa Bay, Inc., Maronda Homes, Summit Contractors, Inc., and Target Builders, as amici curiae.
Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD, and LAGOA, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 So. 3d 47, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20311, 2009 WL 4928301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/master-plaster-inc-v-scottsdale-ins-co-fladistctapp-2009.