Master Cleaning Supply, Inc. v. Oh Sun Kwon

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: October 23, 2019
• Docket: 05-19-00803-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 23, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00803-CV

MASTER CLEANING SUPPLY, INC., Appellant V. OH SUN KWON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-05120-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

The underlying suit in this appeal was filed against appellee, Oh Sun Kwon, by La O, Inc.,

a non-party to the appeal. Kwon then filed third-party claims against appellant, Master Cleaning

Supply, Inc. (“MCS”). MCS failed to answer, and the trial court signed an interlocutory default

judgment against MCS on Kwon’s third-party claims. Almost two years later, the trial court signed

a default judgment against Kwon on La O’s claims. That same day, despite the earlier interlocutory

default judgment against MCS and without referencing that judgment, the trial court also signed

an order dismissing Kwon’s third-party claims against MCS for want of prosecution. By this

appeal, MSC challenges the interlocutory default judgment against it.

Because it appeared the interlocutory default judgment against MCS was superseded by

the subsequent order dismissing the third-party claims, we questioned whether the appeal was moot and we had jurisdiction over the appeal. See Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137,

162 (Tex. 2012) (court lacks jurisdiction over case that has become moot because issues presented

have ceased to exist); Dickson & Assoc. v. Brady, 530 S.W.2d 886, 887-88 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 1975, no writ) (subsequent order dismissing entire case for want of prosecution

necessarily vacated prior interlocutory summary judgment even though trial court did not refer to

prior judgment in dismissal order). At our request, MCS filed a letter brief addressing our concern,

but nothing in the letter brief demonstrates our jurisdiction.

The order dismissing Kwon’s third-party claims vacated the prior interlocutory default

judgment against MCS. See Brady, 530 S.W.2d at 887-88. Accordingly, the appeal is moot and

we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

/Bill Pedersen, III// BILL PEDERSEN. III JUSTICE

190803f.p05 Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MASTER CLEANING SUPPLY, INC., On Appeal from the County Court at Law Appellant No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-05120-B. No. 05-19-00803-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III, Justices Reichek and Carlyle participating. OH SUN KWON, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Oh Sun Kwon recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Master Cleaning Supply, Inc.

Judgment entered this 23rd day of October 2019.