Master Cleaners of Miami, Inc. v. Chantres
471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1573, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14811
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1985·No. No. 84-1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We agree with the appellants that a successor judge may not modify or otherwise disturb an unappealed final order of his predecessor permanently enjoining the use of a business name, see Metropolitan Dade County v. Certain Lands Upon Which Assessments are Delinquent, 471 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), see also In Re Estate of Beeman, 391 So.2d 276, 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and, accordingly, reverse the order of the trial court that does so.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Master Cleaners of Miami, Inc. v. Chantres, 471 So. 2d 646, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1573, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14811 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
471 So. 2d 646 (Master Cleaners of Miami, Inc. v. Chantres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lasky v. Davis
574 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)