Masten v. Hunt

First Circuit

Masten v. Hunt

55 F. 78, 5 C.C.A. 42, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1520

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 13, 1893·No. No. 40·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

NELSON, District Judge.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons given in Ms opinion, which we adopt as the opinion of this court, that the appellant has shown, no infringement of his patent by the appellees. -1 common safety fuse inserted through a plug, such as Is used by the appellees in the manufacture of cannon crackers — -a device as old as the art of Masting, — cannot possibly Toe an equivalent for the combined fuse and match described in the first claim of the patent.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, District Judge.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons given in Ms opinion, which we adopt as the opinion of this court, that the appellant has shown, no infringement of his patent by the appellees. -1 common safety fuse inserted through a plug, such as Is used by the appellees in the manufacture of cannon crackers — -a device as old as the art of Masting, — cannot possibly Toe an equivalent for the combined fuse and match described in the first claim of the patent.

Decree affirmed.

Masten v. Hunt, 55 F. 78, 5 C.C.A. 42, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1520 (1st Cir. 1893).

Pincite

55 F. 78 (Masten v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related