Masten v. Hunt

First Circuit

Masten v. Hunt

55 F. 78, 5 C.C.A. 42, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1520

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1893

DocketNo. 40

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 55 F. 78 (Masten v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Masten v. Hunt, 55 F. 78, 5 C.C.A. 42, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1520 (1st Cir. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

NELSON, District Judge.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons given in Ms opinion, which we adopt as the opinion of this court, that the appellant has shown, no infringement of his patent by the appellees. -1 common safety fuse inserted through a plug, such as Is used by the appellees in the manufacture of cannon crackers — -a device as old as the art of Masting, — cannot possibly Toe an equivalent for the combined fuse and match described in the first claim of the patent.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, District Judge.

We agree with the learned circuit judge who decided this case in the court below, for the reasons given in Ms opinion, which we adopt as the opinion of this court, that the appellant has shown, no infringement of his patent by the appellees. -1 common safety fuse inserted through a plug, such as Is used by the appellees in the manufacture of cannon crackers — -a device as old as the art of Masting, — cannot possibly Toe an equivalent for the combined fuse and match described in the first claim of the patent.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F. 78, 5 C.C.A. 42, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 1520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masten-v-hunt-ca1-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack