Masten v. ABN AMRO MORTG. GROUP
This text of 734 N.W.2d 215 (Masten v. ABN AMRO MORTG. GROUP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronda R. MASTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, and Standard Federal Bank, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would vacate that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals that holds that the foreclosure sale was not voidable and that the plaintiff's claims are barred by laches because the Court of Appeals resolved the case on other grounds, and would allow the plaintiff to raise the issue of whether the foreclosure sale was voidable in the trial court on remand.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
734 N.W.2d 215, 479 Mich. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masten-v-abn-amro-mortg-group-mich-2007.