Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC

246 So. 3d 490

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 2, 2018

DocketNo. 3D17–1394

StatusPublished

This text of 246 So. 3d 490 (Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC, 246 So. 3d 490 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co., Inc., 911 So.2d 1181, 1189 (Fla. 2005) ("[T]o earn a commission a broker must perform two essential tasks: First, the broker must 'initiate[ ] negotiations by doing some affirmative act to bring buyer and seller together.' Second, the broker must remain 'involved in the continuing negotiations between the seller and the buyer,' unless 'the seller and buyer intentionally exclude the broker from the negotiations.' " (citation omitted) ); Burchfield v. Realty Execs., 971 So.2d 138, 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) ("In summary, we hold that section 475.278, Florida Statutes, replaces the common law fiduciary duty owed by a transaction broker to its clients with a more narrowly-defined set of statutory duties.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co., Inc., 911 So.2d 1181, 1189 (Fla. 2005) ("[T]o earn a commission a broker must perform two essential tasks: First, the broker must 'initiate[ ] negotiations by doing some affirmative act to bring buyer and seller together.' Second, the broker must remain 'involved in the continuing negotiations between the seller and the buyer,' unless 'the seller and buyer intentionally exclude the broker from the negotiations.' " (citation omitted) ); Burchfield v. Realty Execs., 971 So.2d 138, 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) ("In summary, we hold that section 475.278, Florida Statutes, replaces the common law fiduciary duty owed by a transaction broker to its clients with a more narrowly-defined set of statutory duties.").

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 So. 3d 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mast-capital-inc-v-whitehall-realty-advisors-llc-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack