Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC

246 So. 3d 490
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2018·No. No. 3D17–1394·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co., Inc., 911 So.2d 1181, 1189 (Fla. 2005) ("[T]o earn a commission a broker must perform two essential tasks: First, the broker must 'initiate[ ] negotiations by doing some affirmative act to bring buyer and seller together.' Second, the broker must remain 'involved in the continuing negotiations between the seller and the buyer,' unless 'the seller and buyer intentionally exclude the broker from the negotiations.' " (citation omitted) ); Burchfield v. Realty Execs., 971 So.2d 138, 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) ("In summary, we hold that section 475.278, Florida Statutes, replaces the common law fiduciary duty owed by a transaction broker to its clients with a more narrowly-defined set of statutory duties.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC, 246 So. 3d 490 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

246 So. 3d 490 (Mast Capital, Inc. v. Whitehall Realty Advisors, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burchfield v. Realty Executives
971 So. 2d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Rotemi Realty, Inc. v. Act Realty Co., Inc.
911 So. 2d 1181 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)