Massucci v. Amoco Oil Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Massucci v. Amoco Oil Co.

270 A.D.2d 318, 705 N.Y.S.2d 242, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2728

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Massucci v. Amoco Oil Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 292 A.D.2d 351 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 2000·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated February 26, 1999, which denied his motion for leave to amend his complaint to assert a direct cause of action against the former third-party defendants Car bo Industries, Inc., and Carbo Terminal Corp.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court correctly denied the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint. Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated February 26, 1999, which denied his motion for leave to amend his complaint to assert a direct cause of action against the former third-party defendants Car bo Industries, Inc., and Carbo Terminal Corp.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court correctly denied the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint. Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Massucci v. Amoco Oil Co., 270 A.D.2d 318, 705 N.Y.S.2d 242, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

270 A.D.2d 318 (Massucci v. Amoco Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.