Home/U.S. Customs Court/Masson v. United States

Masson v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 432
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 18, 1957
DocketNo. 61204; protests 226869-K and 231683-K (Baltimore)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 432 (Masson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Masson v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 432 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

[433]*433Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Sehippach Pencil Olay,” not a ball clay, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Joseph Dixon Crucible Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 157, C. D. 1816), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 157 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masson-v-united-states-cusc-1957.