Masson v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 432
United States Customs Court·Decided September 18, 1957·No. No. 61204; protests 226869-K and 231683-K (Baltimore)·Published
Opinion
[433]*433Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Sehippach Pencil Olay,” not a ball clay, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Joseph Dixon Crucible Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 157, C. D. 1816), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Masson v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 432 (cusc 1957).
39 Cust. Ct. 432 (Masson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 157 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)