Massman v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 501 (Massman v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To vacate an order denying defendants’ motion to strike an amended declaration from the files, in an action against a saloon-keeper and his bondsmen, under 3 How. Stat., Sec. 2283, E. 3.
Denied, with costs, May 1, 1897.
In the original declaration plaintiff (the widow) declared as administratrix. The amended declaration named plaintiff personally and counted upon injuries to her means of support.
It seems that defendants’ counsel, . in consideration of a continuance, stipulated that a “ new declaration” might be’filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massman-v-circuit-judge-mich-1897.