Massimino v. Target Corp.

82 A.D.3d 941, 918 N.Y.2d 734

This text of 82 A.D.3d 941 (Massimino v. Target Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massimino v. Target Corp., 82 A.D.3d 941, 918 N.Y.2d 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, upon reargument, the Supreme Court properly adhered to its original determination granting the separate motions of the defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them (see CPLR 2221 [d] [2]; Marchese v Skenderi, 51 AD3d 642 [2008]; Mazzella v City of New York, 72 AD3d 755, 756 [2010]; Ronconi v Denzel Assoc., 20 AD3d 559, 560 [2005]; Dowden v Long Is. R.R., 305 AD2d 631 [2003]; Ioele v Wal-Mart Stores, 290 AD2d 614, 616 [2002]; Camacho v Garcia, 273 AD2d 835 [2000]). Angiolillo, J.E, Chambers, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronconi v. Denzel Associates
20 A.D.3d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Marchese v. Skenderi
51 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Mazzella v. City of New York
72 A.D.3d 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Camacho v. Garcia
273 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ioele v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
290 A.D.2d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Dowden v. Long Island Rail Road
305 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 941, 918 N.Y.2d 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massimino-v-target-corp-nyappdiv-2011.