Massie v. State

11 S.W. 638, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 617, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 98
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Massie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Tex. Ct. App. 64
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 1889·No. No. 6414·Published

Opinion

White, Presiding Judge.

Objections of defendant to statements made by Mrs. Lambert to the State’s witness, Taylor, were well taken and should have been Sustained by the court, and the evidence excluded, being clearly hearsay testimony and inadmissible.

We are further of opinion that the evidence is wholly insufficient to support the verdict and judgment. ■ In our opinion the evidence shows most clearly a case of illegal arrest of defendant by Rutledge, the alleged injured party, and that defendant was jutifiable in using the force complained of in effecting his release. (Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 976; Meuly v. The State, 26 Texas Ct. App., 307.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Massie v. State, 11 S.W. 638, 27 Tex. Ct. App. 617, 1889 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 98 (Tex. Ct. App. 1889).

11 S.W. 638 (Massie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.