Massie Drilling Co. v. Nees

254 S.W. 629, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 541
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 20, 1923
DocketNo. 2164.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 S.W. 629 (Massie Drilling Co. v. Nees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massie Drilling Co. v. Nees, 254 S.W. 629, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 541 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

KLETT, J.

In Connellee v. Nees, 254 S. W. 625, this day decided, the appellee in that case sued and obtained judgment against the Massie Drilling Company, T. W. Connellee, P. G. Pangburn, T. O. Massie, and estate of Joe M. Collins. The appellee alleged that the Massie Drilling Company was a joint-stock association, as well as a partnership, and that the individuals named composed the partnership. From the judgment rendered the Massie Drilling Company, as- a separate entity, has sued out writ of error to this court, asserting that the service was not sufficient to warrant default judgment against the Massie Drilling Company, which we held to be a partnership. Personal service was obtained on all the members. This was sufficient to bring the partnership before the court and authorize judgment against it, as well as the individual members served. Graham Hotel Corp. v. Leader (Tex. Civ. App.) 241 S. W. 700.

The assignments are overruled, and the judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lakin v. Chicago, Rock-Island & Pacific Ry. Co.
78 S.W.2d 481 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.W. 629, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massie-drilling-co-v-nees-texapp-1923.