Massiah v. Simon
This text of 242 A.D. 782 (Massiah v. Simon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The landlord was on notice that the glass was cracked and that it constituted a hazard. The evidence as to the cracked and loosened condition of the pane of glass was sufficient to justify the submission to the jury of the question of the cause of the child’s injury. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 782, 274 N.Y.S. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massiah-v-simon-nyappdiv-1934.