Massi v. Flynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Massi v. Flynn

46 A.D.3d 685, 846 N.Y.S.2d 920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 A.D.3d 685 (Massi v. Flynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massi v. Flynn, 46 A.D.3d 685, 846 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Edward Flynn, Chief of Police of the Village of Mamaroneck Police Department, suspending the petitioner from his employment as a police officer, Edward Flynn and the Village of Mamaroneck appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated April 27, 2006, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was to enforce a decision, order, and judgment of the same court entered December 22, 2004, directing them to hold a hearing to determine the petitioner’s eligibility for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The parties conceded at oral argument that the hearing that is the subject of this appeal has been conducted. Spolzino, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Edward Flynn, Chief of Police of the Village of Mamaroneck Police Department, suspending the petitioner from his employment as a police officer, Edward Flynn and the Village of Mamaroneck appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated April 27, 2006, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was to enforce a decision, order, and judgment of the same court entered December 22, 2004, directing them to hold a hearing to determine the petitioner’s eligibility for benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The parties conceded at oral argument that the hearing that is the subject of this appeal has been conducted. Spolzino, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.3d 685, 846 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massi-v-flynn-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack