Massey v. State
This text of Massey v. State (Massey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30331 14-SEP-2012 10:13 AM NO. SCWC-30331
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
KIM R. MASSEY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NO. 30331; CR. NO. 06-1-2105)
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Kim R. Massey’s correspondence, which was received and filed on September 5, 2012, which we view as a motion for reconsideration of dismissal of the application for writ of certiorari and for appointment of appellate counsel, and the records and files herein, our rules do not allow for reconsideration of the acceptance or rejection of an application for certiorari. Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(h). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
reconsideration of the order dismissing the application for writ
of certiorari and for appointment of appellate counsel is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 14, 2012. Kim R. Massey, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
petitioner, pro se
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Massey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-state-haw-2012.