Massey v. State
This text of 224 S.E.2d 117 (Massey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, Code Ann. § *485 79A-801 (Ga. L. 1974, pp. 221, 223).
Although the defendant by his enumeration of errors questions the validity of a search warrant, his conviction was based on his plea of guilty which he has in no way attacked or sought to have withdrawn. Insofar as the record reveals, the guilty plea was freely, voluntarily and knowingly entered. Under these circumstances, the defendant waived any objection he may have had to the illegal search. Polk v. Holland, 229 Ga. 169 (2) (190 SE2d 35). See McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759 (90 SC 1441, 25 LE2d 763).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 S.E.2d 117, 137 Ga. App. 484, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-state-gactapp-1976.