Massey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Massey v. State

115 So. 529, 22 Ala. App. 335, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 37

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 10, 1928

Docket3 Div. 583.

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 529 (Massey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massey v. State, 115 So. 529, 22 Ala. App. 335, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 37 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Officers* went into defendant’s place of business and found 2 half pints of whisky sitting on the counter. The evidence made it a question for the jury to say who was in possession of the whisky. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

The fact that 15 one-half pints of whisky in similar bottles and similar whisky were found in close proximity to defendant’s place at the time the 2 one-half pints were found on defendant’s counter was admissible.

We find no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Officers* went into defendant’s place of business and found 2 half pints of whisky sitting on the counter. The evidence made it a question for the jury to say who was in possession of the whisky. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

The fact that 15 one-half pints of whisky in similar bottles and similar whisky were found in close proximity to defendant’s place at the time the 2 one-half pints were found on defendant’s counter was admissible.

We find no error in the record and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 529, 22 Ala. App. 335, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-state-alactapp-1928.