Massey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Massey v. State

98 So. 492, 19 Ala. App. 519, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 305

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 1923·No. 5 Div. 477.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient upon which to base a verdict of guilt, and the fact that there was no evidence tending to connect one of the parties charged in the indictment with the possession of the still, and not here convicted, would not constitute such variance as to entitle others jointly indicted to an acquittal.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case was sufficient upon which to base a verdict of guilt, and the fact that there was no evidence tending to connect one of the parties charged in the indictment with the possession of the still, and not here convicted, would not constitute such variance as to entitle others jointly indicted to an acquittal.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Massey v. State, 98 So. 492, 19 Ala. App. 519, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 305 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

98 So. 492 (Massey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.