Massey v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Massey v. Smith

138 S.E.2d 237, 262 N.C. 611, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 703

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 14, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 S.E.2d 237 (Massey v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massey v. Smith, 138 S.E.2d 237, 262 N.C. 611, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 703 (N.C. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff has only one exception, that is to the charge covering eleven pages of the record. The exception is broadside. It is [612]*612not sufficient to raise the question: Did the court comply with G.S. 1-180? Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926. Hence there is no exception on which to base an assignment of error. Error is not shown by an assignment not supported by appropriate exception. Clifton v. Turner, 257 N.C. 92, 125 S.E. 2d 339; Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff has only one exception, that is to the charge covering eleven pages of the record. The exception is broadside. It is [612]*612not sufficient to raise the question: Did the court comply with G.S. 1-180? Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926. Hence there is no exception on which to base an assignment of error. Error is not shown by an assignment not supported by appropriate exception. Clifton v. Turner, 257 N.C. 92, 125 S.E. 2d 339; Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 S.E.2d 237, 262 N.C. 611, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-smith-nc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack