Massey v. Smith
138 S.E.2d 237, 262 N.C. 611, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 703
Opinion
Plaintiff has only one exception, that is to the charge covering eleven pages of the record. The exception is broadside. It is [612] not sufficient to raise the question: Did the court comply with G.S. 1-180? Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926. Hence there is no exception on which to base an assignment of error. Error is not shown by an assignment not supported by appropriate exception. Clifton v. Turner, 257 N.C. 92, 125 S.E. 2d 339; Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Massey v. Smith, 138 S.E.2d 237, 262 N.C. 611, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 703 (N.C. 1964).
138 S.E.2d 237 (Massey v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Dunn
141 S.E.2d 630 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)