Massey v. School Dist. No. 58

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Massey v. School Dist. No. 58

1924 OK 76, 222 P. 674, 101 Okla. 13, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 6

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 22, 1924

Docket12815

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1924 OK 76 (Massey v. School Dist. No. 58) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massey v. School Dist. No. 58, 1924 OK 76, 222 P. 674, 101 Okla. 13, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 6 (Okla. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

COCHRAN, J.

This action was filed to enjoin the issuance and sale of certain bonds of school district No. 58, of Wagoner county, Okla., which were authorized at a special election held for that purpose on August 26, 3921. Pending the appeal in this court, funds have been raised in another way for the purpose for which the bonds were voted, and the school board of *14 the district has adopted a resolution reaeinding all proceedings relative to the issuance of the bonds ánd canceling the bond issue. In these circumstances the issues now presented to this court are abstract and hypothetical, and no particular relief can be afforded plaintiff in the action, and for that reason the appeal should be dismissed. and it is so ordered.

JOHNSON, O. J., and McNEILL, NICHOLSON, and HARRISON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COCHRAN, J.

This action was filed to enjoin the issuance and sale of certain bonds of school district No. 58, of Wagoner county, Okla., which were authorized at a special election held for that purpose on August 26, 3921. Pending the appeal in this court, funds have been raised in another way for the purpose for which the bonds were voted, and the school board of *14 the district has adopted a resolution reaeinding all proceedings relative to the issuance of the bonds ánd canceling the bond issue. In these circumstances the issues now presented to this court are abstract and hypothetical, and no particular relief can be afforded plaintiff in the action, and for that reason the appeal should be dismissed. and it is so ordered.

JOHNSON, O. J., and McNEILL, NICHOLSON, and HARRISON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1924 OK 76, 222 P. 674, 101 Okla. 13, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-school-dist-no-58-okla-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack