Massey v. Nostos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Massey v. Nostos

42 A.D.2d 608, 346 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 608 (Massey v. Nostos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massey v. Nostos, 42 A.D.2d 608, 346 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 9, 1968, as dismissed the complaint insofar as it is against defendant Cadillac Diner Inc., after a nonjury trial. (The trial court awarded plaintiff $3,000 damages against defendant Perry Nostos on the false arrest cause and dismissed as against both defendants the malicious prosecution cause of action.) Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs to appellant against respondent Cadillac Diner Inc., and case remanded to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment awarding appellant a recovery of $3,000 on the first cause of action (false arrest) against said respondent as well as against defendant Nostos. In our opinion, the evidence warrants judgment against Cadillac Diner Inc., as well as against its employee, Nostos, on the first cause of action (see PernardAne v. City of New York, 268 App. Div. 444, affd. 294 N. Y.. 361). Rabin, F. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 9, 1968, as dismissed the complaint insofar as it is against defendant Cadillac Diner Inc., after a nonjury trial. (The trial court awarded plaintiff $3,000 damages against defendant Perry Nostos on the false arrest cause and dismissed as against both defendants the malicious prosecution cause of action.) Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs to appellant against respondent Cadillac Diner Inc., and case remanded to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment awarding appellant a recovery of $3,000 on the first cause of action (false arrest) against said respondent as well as against defendant Nostos. In our opinion, the evidence warrants judgment against Cadillac Diner Inc., as well as against its employee, Nostos, on the first cause of action (see PernardAne v. City of New York, 268 App. Div. 444, affd. 294 N. Y.. 361). Rabin, F. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Shapiro and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 608, 346 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-nostos-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack