Massey v. . Massey

182 S.E. 446, 208 N.C. 818, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 141
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 20, 1935·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per CueiaM.

Tbe court below found tbat the facts set forth in the complaint were true, that the plaintiff had not sufficient means whereon to subsist during the prosecution of the suit and to defray the necessary and proper expenses thereof, and thereupon made the order from which defendant appealed.

These findings of fact warrant the making of an allowance, and the amount does not appear unreasonable or excessive.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Massey v. . Massey, 182 S.E. 446, 208 N.C. 818, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 141 (N.C. 1935).

182 S.E. 446 (Massey v. . Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cameron v. Cameron
56 S.E.2d 384 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Nall v. . Nall
50 S.E.2d 737 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Peele v. . Peele
4 S.E.2d 616 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
Ragan v. . Ragan
197 S.E. 554 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)