Massey v. Massey

164 So. 2d 498, 276 Ala. 502, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 385
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 6, 1964
Docket7 Div. 609
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 164 So. 2d 498 (Massey v. Massey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massey v. Massey, 164 So. 2d 498, 276 Ala. 502, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 385 (Ala. 1964).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The only changed circumstance shown is. the husband’s remarriage. This alone is. not sufficient to justify modification of the alimony allowance. Aiken v. Aiken, 221 Ala. 67, 127 So. 819; Jones v. Jones, 251 Ala. 179, 36 So.2d 310; Young v. Young, 262 Ala. 254, 78 So.2d 265. The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Simpson, J. We are, therefore, of opinion that the decree should be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded

[503]*503LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL, COLEMAN, and HARWOOD, JJ., concur. SIMPSON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snow v. Snow
393 So. 2d 1020 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1981)
McEntire v. McEntire
345 So. 2d 316 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Johnson v. Johnson
167 So. 2d 688 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 2d 498, 276 Ala. 502, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-massey-ala-1964.