Massey v. Massey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Massey v. Massey

164 So. 2d 498, 276 Ala. 502, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 385

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 6, 1964·No. 7 Div. 609·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The only changed circumstance shown is. the husband’s remarriage. This alone is. not sufficient to justify modification of the alimony allowance. Aiken v. Aiken, 221 Ala. 67, 127 So. 819; Jones v. Jones, 251 Ala. 179, 36 So.2d 310; Young v. Young, 262 Ala. 254, 78 So.2d 265. The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Simpson, J. We are, therefore, of opinion that the decree should be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded

[503]*503LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL, COLEMAN, and HARWOOD, JJ., concur. SIMPSON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only changed circumstance shown is. the husband’s remarriage. This alone is. not sufficient to justify modification of the alimony allowance. Aiken v. Aiken, 221 Ala. 67, 127 So. 819; Jones v. Jones, 251 Ala. 179, 36 So.2d 310; Young v. Young, 262 Ala. 254, 78 So.2d 265. The facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Simpson, J. We are, therefore, of opinion that the decree should be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded

[503]*503LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, GOODWYN, MERRILL, COLEMAN, and HARWOOD, JJ., concur. SIMPSON, J., dissents.

Massey v. Massey, 164 So. 2d 498, 276 Ala. 502, 1964 Ala. LEXIS 385 (Ala. 1964).

Pincite

164 So. 2d 498 (Massey v. Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related