Massey v. Franklin County Schools

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 6, 2009
DocketI.C. NO. 672713.
StatusPublished

This text of Massey v. Franklin County Schools (Massey v. Franklin County Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massey v. Franklin County Schools, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Deluca and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence of record and amend the Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission modified the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Deluca.

***********
RULING ON EVIDENTIARY MATTER *Page 2
Plaintiff filed a Motion to Supplement the Record to add the Employment Security Commission Work Search Record he completed showing his job search efforts from July 1, 2007 through September 11, 2007. Defendants did not file a Response or object to the Motion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED and plaintiff's Exhibit 18 is hereby admitted into the evidence of record.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the Commission and the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter.

2. At all times relevant to this claim, an employer-employee relationship existed between Christopher Massey and Franklin County Schools.

3. The employer is self-insured and Key Risk Management Services is the third-party administrator.

4. Plaintiff was hired by Franklin County Schools as a middle school teacher as of August 18, 2006.

5. The Pretrial Agreement was marked as Stipulated Exhibit 1. The remaining exhibits that were accepted into evidence include plaintiff's Exhibits 1-17; and defendant's Exhibits 1-3; 6; 10-13.

*********** *Page 3
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was born on March 6, 1958. He obtained a bachelor's degree in criminal justice. As of the date of hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff stood approximately five feet eight inches tall and weighed approximately 190 pounds.

2. In 2005, plaintiff had some serious health problems, which were ultimately diagnosed as cardiac problems. In the fall of 2005 he had multiple cardiac bypass surgery. At the time of these medical problems and his surgery, plaintiff was a Correctional Officer with the rank of Sergeant with the Alabama Department of Corrections. Because of continuing physical problems following his heart surgery, plaintiff was found to be permanently disabled from resuming his duties as a Correctional Officer. He returned to North Carolina, where he had grown up and where his family resided.

3. Plaintiff had experienced some on-going problems from his heart surgery. These included problems with his collarbone as well as on-going pain in his upper body and numbness in his arms and hands. As a result, once he returned to North Carolina he had established himself as a patient at the Rex Pain Management Center (a.k.a. Carolina Pain Consultants), being treated primarily by Dr. Buchheit.

4. Plaintiff was hired by Franklin County Schools as a "lateral entry" or provisional teacher as of August 18, 2006. He was assigned to teach at Cedar Creek Middle School.

5. On September 18, 2006, at around noon, plaintiff allowed his class to go to the bathrooms on the eighth grade hall. A short time later he realized there was a crowd gathered around the door to the boys' bathroom. He went in and found two students fighting. He ordered *Page 4 them to stop and when they did not he attempted to intervene and separate them. Both of the boys were about as large as plaintiff. As he tried to break up the fight by pushing the boys against the wall of the bathroom, one of the boys pushed plaintiff to the floor. Plaintiff was not able to break his fall and landed hard on his buttocks.

6. After the fight ended, plaintiff took both students to the office and informed the school secretary about the fight. On his way back to his room, he also reported the incident to a vice principal.

7. While plaintiff did not immediately feel pain, he woke the following day with pain. The pain was in the middle of his back and down his left side below his rib cage.

8. Because of the on-going problems and pain that he had experienced from the heart surgery, plaintiff first thought that this new pain that he was experiencing after breaking up the student fight could be related to his heart problem. Because he had not established himself with a cardiologist, the earliest appointment that plaintiff could get was on October 2, 2006. Plaintiff continued to work following the incident of September 18, 2006, but was experiencing pain. At the appointment with the cardiologist, plaintiff reported left flank pain off and on for the past two weeks. The doctor evaluated him and concluded that the pain was not related to his heart problems.

9. On October 2, 2006, plaintiff was also seen at Rex Pain Management Center by Kim Graham, a nurse practitioner. Plaintiff had been treating at Rex Pain Management Center for problems arising from his cardiac surgery, including numbness in his upper extremities. Plaintiff reported his chest wall pain, arm numbness, and leg numbness were improved since his previous visit on August 9, 2006. There is also no indication in this medical record that plaintiff complained of low back pain. However, this was a regularly scheduled appointment and plaintiff *Page 5 was seen by a cardiologist for his left flank pain that same day. As Dr. Buchheit indicated in his deposition, it is not unusual for patients to report matters that pertain solely to the condition for which the doctor is treating them when they appear for a regularly scheduled appointment.

10. On the morning of October 11, 2006, plaintiff experienced sharp pain in his lower back and numbness in his left leg. The pain was such that he was unable to report to work that day. He went to Wake Forest Urgent Care for treatment.

11. The treatment record from the Urgent Care indicates that plaintiff reported not only pain in his left side but also down his left hip. The record indicates that the left hip had been bothering him for about three weeks.

12. On October 16, 2006, plaintiff saw Dr. Al-Sabbagh of Gastroenterology Hepatology. Plaintiff stated that he recently started having left upper quadrant abdominal pain that radiated to the back. Plaintiff described the pain as a constant aching pain that was not sharp. Dr. Al-Sabbagh recommended a colonoscopy, which found no significant problems, and eventually referred plaintiff for a lumbar MRI.

13. On October 25, 2006, Brooke Wheeler, principal of Cedar Creek Middle School, performed a formal evaluation of plaintiff's classroom. The evaluation determined that plaintiff performed below standard or unsatisfactory in five of the eight areas of evaluation.

14. Based upon the poor evaluation, Ms. Wheeler met with plaintiff and placed him on a Professional Action Plan on or about October 26, 2006. Ms. Wheeler testified that plaintiff did not complain of pain during this meeting.

15. A lumbar MRI was performed on October 27, 2006. The MRI revealed a left paramedial posterior disc herniation at L4-5 displacing the left L5 nerve root. Plaintiff returned to Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conyers v. New Hanover County Schools
654 S.E.2d 745 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution
425 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)
Holley v. Acts, Inc.
581 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2003)
State v. . Biggers
12 S.E. 1024 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Massey v. Franklin County Schools, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-franklin-county-schools-ncworkcompcom-2009.