Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Massey v. Crosby

Massey v. Crosby

874 So. 2d 614, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 2004 WL 575397
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-3367
StatusPublished

This text of 874 So. 2d 614 (Massey v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massey v. Crosby, 874 So. 2d 614, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 2004 WL 575397 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus claiming improper calculation of gain time is denied. See § 944.275(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1995)(enacted by chapter 95-294, § 2, Laws of Florida and providing that “[f]or sentences imposed for offenses committed on or after October 1,1995, the department may grant [615]*615up to 10 days per month of incentive gain-time . Comer v. Moore, 817 So.2d 784 (Fla.2002)(concluding that even though chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida — which included some gain time provisions — was unconstitutional, chapter 95-294, Laws of Florida — which provided for reduced gain time for all offenders — is constitutional).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Comer v. Moore
817 So. 2d 784 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 So. 2d 614, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 2004 WL 575397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2004.