Massey v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Massey v. Crosby

874 So. 2d 614, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 2004 WL 575397

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2004·No. No. 3D03-3367·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus claiming improper calculation of gain time is denied. See § 944.275(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1995)(enacted by chapter 95-294, § 2, Laws of Florida and providing that “[f]or sentences imposed for offenses committed on or after October 1,1995, the department may grant [615] up to 10 days per month of incentive gain-time . Comer v. Moore, 817 So.2d 784 (Fla.2002)(concluding that even though chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida — which included some gain time provisions — was unconstitutional, chapter 95-294, Laws of Florida — which provided for reduced gain time for all offenders — is constitutional).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s petition for writ of ha-beas corpus claiming improper calculation of gain time is denied. See § 944.275(4)(b)3, Fla. Stat. (1995)(enacted by chapter 95-294, § 2, Laws of Florida and providing that “[f]or sentences imposed for offenses committed on or after October 1,1995, the department may grant [615] up to 10 days per month of incentive gain-time . Comer v. Moore, 817 So.2d 784 (Fla.2002)(concluding that even though chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida — which included some gain time provisions — was unconstitutional, chapter 95-294, Laws of Florida — which provided for reduced gain time for all offenders — is constitutional).

Massey v. Crosby, 874 So. 2d 614, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3300, 2004 WL 575397 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

874 So. 2d 614 (Massey v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related