Massey Services, Inc. v. Knox

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Massey Services, Inc. v. Knox

80 So. 3d 1140, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2012 WL 695673

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 2012

Docket1D11-6474

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 So. 3d 1140 (Massey Services, Inc. v. Knox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massey Services, Inc. v. Knox, 80 So. 3d 1140, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2012 WL 695673 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s timely response to this Court’s show cause order entered December 19, 2011, the Court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In the order on appeal, the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) awarded temporary partial disability benefits but reserved jurisdiction as to the amount of those benefits due. Accordingly, the order is not a final order because it does not dispose of all matters presented to the JCC for adjudication. See, e.g., Emro Mktg. v. Schwier, 670 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Bradley v. Hurricane Rest., 652 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The order is also not an appealable nonfinal order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(1)(A), (B), or (C).

DISMISSED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of Appellant’s timely response to this Court’s show cause order entered December 19, 2011, the Court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. In the order on appeal, the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) awarded temporary partial disability benefits but reserved jurisdiction as to the amount of those benefits due. Accordingly, the order is not a final order because it does not dispose of all matters presented to the JCC for adjudication. See, e.g., Emro Mktg. v. Schwier, 670 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Bradley v. Hurricane Rest., 652 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The order is also not an appealable nonfinal order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180(b)(1)(A), (B), or (C).

DISMISSED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 3d 1140, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2012 WL 695673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-services-inc-v-knox-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack