Massey-Ferguson Ltd. v. Intermountain Ford Tractor Sales Co.

325 F.2d 713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 24, 1963
DocketNo. 7278
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 325 F.2d 713 (Massey-Ferguson Ltd. v. Intermountain Ford Tractor Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massey-Ferguson Ltd. v. Intermountain Ford Tractor Sales Co., 325 F.2d 713 (10th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question presented on this interlocutory appeal in an antitrust suit is whether the appellant Canadian corporation was, as the trial Court held, transacting business and found within the District of Utah, so as to be amenable to venue and process in that District, under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 738, 15 U.S.C. § 22.

We agree with the trial Court that by reason of its interlocking and integrated control of “North American Operations," the appellant Canadian corporation was enabled to and did direct “the detailed activities of the American corporation, including the operation of company stores in both Utah and Idaho; * * ” and that it was, therefore, transacting business and found through its subsidiary within the District. Intermountain Ford Tractor Sales Company, a corporation et al. v. Massey-Ferguson Limited, a corporation et al., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 930, 939.

The judgment of the trial Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rothberg v. Kirschenbaum
725 F.2d 880 (Second Circuit, 1984)
In Re Beck Industries, Inc.
725 F.2d 880 (Second Circuit, 1984)
Johnson v. Warnaco, Inc.
426 F. Supp. 44 (S.D. Mississippi, 1976)
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior Court
551 P.2d 847 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
Call Carl, Inc. v. BP Oil Corporation
391 F. Supp. 367 (D. Maryland, 1975)
Luria Steel & Trading Corporation v. Ogden Corporation
327 F. Supp. 1345 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
Flank Oil Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
277 F. Supp. 357 (D. Colorado, 1967)
Hayashi v. Sunshine Garden Products, Inc.
285 F. Supp. 632 (W.D. Washington, 1967)
Hoffman Motors Corporation v. Alfa Romeo SpA
244 F. Supp. 70 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Fooshee v. Interstate Vending Company
234 F. Supp. 44 (D. Kansas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
325 F.2d 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massey-ferguson-ltd-v-intermountain-ford-tractor-sales-co-ca10-1963.