Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Childress

510 P.2d 1358, 89 Nev. 272
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 1973·No. No. 7027·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from an order that upheld respondent’s claim to a homestead exemption in certain real property, and released a writ of execution levied thereon.

Appellant contends the order was erroneous because respondent recorded his homestead declaration only three days prior to the scheduled sheriff’s sale of the property. Such contention has no merit. NRS 21.090(1) (m); NRS 115.010; Hawthorne v. Smith, 3 Nev. 182 (1867).

Review of other contentions is precluded by lack of a complete record on appeal. Meakin v. Meakin, 88 Nev. 25, 492 P.2d 1304 (1972); Lindauer v. Allen, 85 Nev. 430, 456 P.2d 851 (1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Childress, 510 P.2d 1358, 89 Nev. 272 (Neb. 1973).

510 P.2d 1358 (Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. Childress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AGUIRRE, JR. v. ELKO CTY. SHERIFF'S OFFICE
2022 NV 32 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2022)
In re Nilsson
2013 NV 101 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
Van Meter v. Nilsson
315 P.3d 966 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)