Massengill v. J. E. Womble & Sons, Inc.
This text of 128 S.E.2d 243 (Massengill v. J. E. Womble & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no evidence sufficient to support a finding that the negligence of defendant Horton, if any, was a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries and property damage. Nor do we find evidence sufficient to support a finding that plaintiff was contributorily negligent. Hence, there is no error in the rulings referred to in our preliminary statement.
Other assignments brought forward in appellants’ brief relate to alleged errors in respect of the court’s charge to the jury. However, none of these assignments discloses prejudicial error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 S.E.2d 243, 258 N.C. 181, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massengill-v-j-e-womble-sons-inc-nc-1962.