Massengale v. Ray
665 So. 2d 1152, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1996 WL 8248
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 1996
DocketNo. 94-2911
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 665 So. 2d 1152 (Massengale v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Massengale v. Ray, 665 So. 2d 1152, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1996 WL 8248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Because Ray’s third-party complaint did not allege a claim for either indemnification, subrogation or contribution, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse. See Rupp v. Philpot, 619 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duggan v. Department of Corrections
665 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
665 So. 2d 1152, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 97, 1996 WL 8248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massengale-v-ray-fladistctapp-1996.