Massengale v. George

Ohio Supreme Court

Massengale v. George

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 1963

DocketNo. 37922

StatusPublished

This text of 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558 (Massengale v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Massengale v. George, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus will not be granted unless the relator establishes a clear legal right thereto. There is no bill of exceptions to show what, if any, evidence the relator presented to the Court of Appeals to establish his right to a writ.

The relator not having established a clear legal right to the relief sought, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus will not be granted unless the relator establishes a clear legal right thereto. There is no bill of exceptions to show what, if any, evidence the relator presented to the Court of Appeals to establish his right to a writ.

The relator not having established a clear legal right to the relief sought, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massengale-v-george-ohio-1963.