Massengale v. George

Ohio Supreme Court

Massengale v. George

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 29, 1963·No. No. 37922·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus will not be granted unless the relator establishes a clear legal right thereto. There is no bill of exceptions to show what, if any, evidence the relator presented to the Court of Appeals to establish his right to a writ.

The relator not having established a clear legal right to the relief sought, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A writ of mandamus will not be granted unless the relator establishes a clear legal right thereto. There is no bill of exceptions to show what, if any, evidence the relator presented to the Court of Appeals to establish his right to a writ.

The relator not having established a clear legal right to the relief sought, the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0 ’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Massengale v. George, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 558 (Massengale v. George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.