Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Massaro v. State

Massaro v. State

244 So. 3d 333
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 2018
DocketNo. 4D17–2245
StatusPublished

This text of 244 So. 3d 333 (Massaro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Massaro v. State, 244 So. 3d 333 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the denial of appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence, but we reverse the portion of the order prohibiting appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings. The trial court did not give appellant notice or an opportunity to respond before entering the order. See State v. Spencer , 751 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1999) ; Jones v. State , 221 So.3d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; Stokes v. State , 50 So.3d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Hines v. State , 949 So.2d 1086, 1087 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.

Gross, Taylor and Conner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Stokes v. State
50 So. 3d 1234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Jones v. State
221 So. 3d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Hines v. State
949 So. 2d 1086 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 So. 3d 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/massaro-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.