Massard v. State

540 So. 2d 939, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1909, 1989 WL 33949
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Massard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1561
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1989·No. No. 87-2844·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. We previously reversed for resentencing based upon various problems in the original sentencing process 501 So.2d 1289. On remand, a different judge presided over appellant’s resentencing and the order which resulted from that hearing is the subject of the present appeal. We again reverse and remand based, inter alia, upon failure of the trial court to support departure from the sentencing guidelines with written reasons.

[940]*940We direct that, upon remand, appellant shall be afforded a new sentencing hearing and that the following factors shall apply at resentencing:

1. The trial court shall comply with rule 3.700(c) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure;

2. Points shall NOT be scored for victim injury; and

3. If the new sentence exceeds the guidelines recommended range, written reasons for departure shall be given.

The final judgment shall be amended to reduce the two robberies from life felonies to first-degree felonies and the costs imposed pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1987), shall be stricken.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Massard v. State, 540 So. 2d 939, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 913, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1909, 1989 WL 33949 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

540 So. 2d 939 (Massard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Massard v. State
501 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)