Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Charles P. Davies, IV

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided October 3, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01475·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MEDFORD DIVISION

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff, No. 1:23-cv-01475-CL

v. ORDER

CHARLES P. DAVIES, IV,

Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”) filed by Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke. ECF No. 15. Judge Clarke recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 11, be GRANTED. Under the Federal Magistrates Act, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, “the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). For those portions of a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to which neither party has objected, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) (“There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate’s report to which no objections are filed.”). Although no review is required in the absence of objections, the Magistrates Act “does not preclude further review by the

district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard.” Id. at 154. The Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that “[w]hen no timely objection is filed,” the court should review the recommendation for “clear error on the face of the record.” In this case, no objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the F&R and finds no error. The F&R is ADOPTED and the Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly.

It is so ORDERED and DATED this _3_r_d__ day of October 2024.

/s/Ann Aiken ANN AIKEN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Charles P. Davies, IV, (D. Or. 2024).

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Charles P. Davies, IV (Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Charles P. Davies, IV) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)