Masors v. Sokolow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Masors v. Sokolow

254 A.D. 796, 4 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7648

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 796 (Masors v. Sokolow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Masors v. Sokolow, 254 A.D. 796, 4 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

'Appeal from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster county clerk’s office, vacating and setting aside plaintiff’s notice of examination of the defendant before trial, in an action to recover for labor and materials which had been furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. (See Brand v. Butts, 242 App. Div. 149; Public Nat. Bank v. Not. City Bank, 261N. Y. 316; Breault v. Embossing Co., Inc., 253 App. Div. 175.) The defendant is directed to appear for examination before the person named in the original notice, at his office, on the 21st day of May, 1938, at ten o’clock in the forenoon of that day. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and HefEeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

'Appeal from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster county clerk’s office, vacating and setting aside plaintiff’s notice of examination of the defendant before trial, in an action to recover for labor and materials which had been furnished by the plaintiff to the defendant. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. (See Brand v. Butts, 242 App. Div. 149; Public Nat. Bank v. Not. City Bank, 261N. Y. 316; Breault v. Embossing Co., Inc., 253 App. Div. 175.) The defendant is directed to appear for examination before the person named in the original notice, at his office, on the 21st day of May, 1938, at ten o’clock in the forenoon of that day. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and HefEeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 796, 4 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masors-v-sokolow-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack