Masor v. Blumstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Masor v. Blumstein

30 Misc. 787, 63 N.Y.S. 91

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 787 (Masor v. Blumstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Masor v. Blumstein, 30 Misc. 787, 63 N.Y.S. 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Truax, P. J.

With the consent of the defendants, plaintiffs were allowed to state on the trial that they had been damaged thirty-two dollars and fifty cents hy the failure of the defendants to perform their contract. If this evidence had been objected to in time, or if defendants had moved to' strike it out, it probably would not appear in the ease. Appearing in the case it is sufficient to sustain the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Dugro, J., concurs; Scott, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Truax, P. J.

With the consent of the defendants, plaintiffs were allowed to state on the trial that they had been damaged thirty-two dollars and fifty cents hy the failure of the defendants to perform their contract. If this evidence had been objected to in time, or if defendants had moved to' strike it out, it probably would not appear in the ease. Appearing in the case it is sufficient to sustain the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Dugro, J., concurs; Scott, J., not voting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 787, 63 N.Y.S. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masor-v-blumstein-nyappterm-1900.