Masood v. Erwin Oil Company

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 27, 2008
DocketI.C. NO. 013942.
StatusPublished

This text of Masood v. Erwin Oil Company (Masood v. Erwin Oil Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Masood v. Erwin Oil Company, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2008).

Opinion

* * * * * * * * * * *
Based upon the opinion of the Court of Appeals holding that defendant-Erwin Oil Company is a statutory employer pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19 and remanding the matter to the Commission for additional findings of fact regarding plaintiff's injuries and defendants' liability, the Full Commission enters the following: *Page 2

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. Plaintiff contends that on August 6, 1999 he suffered a compensable injury by accident during the course of and within the scope of his employment as a cashier at the Tri-Star Amoco Food Shop, when he was shot in the neck during an armed robbery. Defendants deny that plaintiff suffered an injury by accident during the course of and within the scope of his employment.

2. Plaintiff contends that at all times relevant to his claim, Iftikhar Abbasi and Tri-Star Amoco Food Shop regularly employed three or more employees and were bound by and subject to the Workers' Compensation Act.

3. Erwin Oil Company (hereinafter "Erwin Oil") is the lessee of the building in which the Tri-Star Amoco Food Shop is located and sub-leased the building to Iftikhar Abbasi pursuant to a written lease dated December 1, 1997.

4. Erwin Oil regularly employs three or more employees and is subject to and bound by the Workers' Compensation Act.

5. The following are documents kept in the regular course of business of the Industrial Commission and are part of the record of this case:

a. Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Pre-hearing Depositions, or, In the Alternative, for a Special Hearing to Preserve the Testimony of plaintiff Akhtar Masood and the Testimony of Navida Masood;

*Page 3

b. Order Allowing Pre-hearing Depositions of Akhtar Masood and Navida Masood;

c. Form 61 submitted by defendant-employer;

d. Plaintiff's Second Amended Form 18, submitted to the Commission on October 3, 2000;

e. Plaintiff's Amended Form 33, filed with the Commission on October 5, 2000;

f. Form 33R submitted to the Commission by defendants;

g. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice of Iftikhar Abbasi d/b/a Tri-Star Amoco Food Shop, Inc.

6. The following medical records, which were submitted to the Commission at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, were admitted into evidence as records maintained in the regular course of activity of the physician or institution identified:

a. Duke University Medical Center, hospital and surgical records, 8/6/99 — 3/15/00 (350 pages)

b. Omni Eye Specialists, reports dated 12/17/02 and 8/20/03, record of examination (3 pages)

c. Vision World, records of examination, 10/28/02 — 7/2/03 (6 pages)

7. At the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, defendants stipulated that they would not contest plaintiff's testimony with respect to his employment relationship Iftikhar Abbasi d/b/a Tri-Star Amoco Food Shop, Inc.

* * * * * * * * * * * *Page 4
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was 53 years old at the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner. He is married and has four children. He is a native and citizen of Pakistan.

2. In February 1999 plaintiff started to work as a cashier at the Tri-Star Amoco, a gas station and convenience store that was leased and operated by Iftikhar Abbasi (hereinafter, "Abbasi").

3. Plaintiff held his position of cashier at the Tri-Star Amoco from February 1999 through August 6, 1999. Plaintiff worked in the Tri-Star Amoco every day, in the afternoon and evening hours, throughout the course of his employment there. Plaintiff earned $5.75 per hour and worked 3:00 p.m. to 12 midnight Monday through Saturday and 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sundays.

4. Throughout the course of plaintiff's employment there, the Tri-Star Amoco employed three or more employees. Abbasi had no workers' compensation insurance to cover any of these employees.

5. The building which houses the Tri-Star Amoco is owned by Erwin Distribution Company, a sister corporation of Erwin Oil, which owns the gasoline tanks, pumps and other parts of equipment on the premises of the Tri-Star Amoco. Erwin Oil is in the general business of buying and reselling petroleum products: gasoline, diesel fuel, kerosene, and the like, and is known in the petroleum industry as a jobber dealer. Erwin Oil builds, leases out, and runs gasoline station/convenience stores. As of the time of the hearing before the Deputy *Page 5 Commissioner, Erwin Oil owned 23 gas station/convenience stores. All of these stores sold petroleum products.

6. Some of Erwin Oil's business involves selling gasoline through retail stores owned by Erwin Oil but run by others, and some involves selling gasoline through retail stores that are run directly by Erwin Oil. At all of these stores, employees perform the work of selling gasoline.

7. Erwin Oil has had a relationship with Amoco Oil Company (hereinafter "Amoco") and its successor corporation BP, since 1945. At the time of the injury that is the subject of this case, Erwin Oil had a "Branded Jobber Contract" with Amoco Oil Company.

8. Pursuant to the branded jobber contract, Erwin Oil agreed to "purchase and receive Amoco's currently offered and available branded petroleum products," "offer for sale, or cause to be offered for sale, representative amounts of each grade of Amoco-based gasoline, currently offered to [Erwin Oil], necessary to satisfy public demand," and "use its best efforts to market the Products covered by this Contract."

9. The majority of gasoline purchased by Erwin Oil pursuant to its contract with Amoco is sold to the public through gas stations owned by Erwin Oil and its affiliate corporation. Erwin Oil delivers gasoline to all of the convenience stores it owns, regardless of whether they are operated by Erwin Oil, or by others through contractual agreements.

10. At the time of plaintiff's employment, Erwin Oil had a lease agreement with Abbasi, through which Abbasi would sell gasoline at the Tri-Star Amoco and otherwise operate the Tri Star-Amoco as a retail store. A primary purpose of the business located at the premises of the Tri Star Amoco is to sell gasoline to the public. Under the terms of the lease, Abbasi was required to "operate the facility open to the public 18 hours per day, 7 days a week." *Page 6

11. The contract between Erwin Oil and Abbasi is a subcontract whereby Abbasi has undertaken to perform part of the work contracted between Erwin Oil and Amoco, namely, to market and sell gasoline to meet public demand. Erwin Oil is a principal contractor or intermediate contractor, and Abbasi is a subcontractor.

12. Erwin Oil did not obtain from any source a certificate of workers' compensation insurance or self-insurance covering Abbasi or his employees, as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19.

13.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ales v. T. A. Loving Co.
593 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Masood v. Erwin Oil Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masood-v-erwin-oil-company-ncworkcompcom-2008.