Masonite Co. of Canada, Ltd. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 669
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 24, 1961
DocketReap. Dec. 9982; Entry No. 15734, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 669 (Masonite Co. of Canada, Ltd. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Masonite Co. of Canada, Ltd. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 669 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Kao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule C, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed on Schedule O, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of Masonite Presdwood, Panelwood, and similar products exported from Canada during 1957.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there is no foreign value, export value or United States value, as those terms are defined in section 402 (c) (d) and (e), respectively, of the Tariff Act of 1930, for such or similar merchandise and that the costs of production as defined in section 402(f) of said Act for the respective products marked A and checked LXL by Examiner Leon X. Ludwig on said invoices, is stated on Schedule A hereto attached and made a part hereof, and said costs of production for the respective products marked B and checked LXL by Examiner Leon X. Ludwig on said invoices, is stated on Schedule B hereto attached and made a part hereof.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for re-appraisement be submitted on the stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1980, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were for the respective products marked A and checked LXL, by Examiner Leon X. Ludwig, on the invoices covered by said appeals, as stated on schedule A, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, and for the respective products marked B and checked LXL, by Examiner Leon X. Ludwig, on the invoices covered by these appeals, as stated on schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

[670]*670Schedule A

Cost of Cost of

Product production Product production

Standard Presdwood %"-$44.23 Panelwood_$48.29

Standard Presdwood ?i«"- 70.28 Quartrboard_ 55.85

Standard Presdwood %"- 78. 02 Underlayment_ 57.53

Standard Presdwood - 105.32 Black Tempered Presdwood

Tempered Presdwood _ 51.72 Ys”_ 70.13

Tempered Presdwood lie"- 83. 86 Black Tempered Presdwood

Tempered Presdwood _ 98.39 - 88.48

Tempered Presdwood %e”_127.11 Temprtile %"_ 65. 36

Schedule B

Product Cost of production

Standard Presdwood %"_ $38.10

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Cust. Ct. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masonite-co-of-canada-ltd-v-united-states-cusc-1961.