Masone v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Masone v. New York City Housing Authority

279 A.D.2d 323, 719 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 472

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 323 (Masone v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Masone v. New York City Housing Authority, 279 A.D.2d 323, 719 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about November 24, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted, on default, defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The motion court’s refusal to consider plaintiffs opposition papers served after the date fixed for their receipt in a written stipulation (CPLR 2214 [c]) constituted a finding of default on the motion, for which plaintiffs remedy is not an appeal but a motion to vacate the default (CPLR 5511; Shannon v City of New York, 275 AD2d 671). Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Since plaintiffs opposition papers appeared to have merit, we grant leave, sua sponte, to plaintiff to move to vacate the default within 30 days of the date of this order. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about November 24, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted, on default, defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The motion court’s refusal to consider plaintiffs opposition papers served after the date fixed for their receipt in a written stipulation (CPLR 2214 [c]) constituted a finding of default on the motion, for which plaintiffs remedy is not an appeal but a motion to vacate the default (CPLR 5511; Shannon v City of New York, 275 AD2d 671). Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Since plaintiffs opposition papers appeared to have merit, we grant leave, sua sponte, to plaintiff to move to vacate the default within 30 days of the date of this order. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 323, 719 N.Y.S.2d 241, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/masone-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack