Mason v. Wright

54 Mass. 306
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Mass. 306 (Mason v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mason v. Wright, 54 Mass. 306 (Mass. 1847).

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

The minor was not competent to enter into trade, and was not bound by the contract, though it was a partnership contract. The case is not distinguishable from that of Tupper v. Cadwell, decided on the present circuit. 12 Met. 559. In that case, we held that a minor was not legally bound to pay for repairs made on his dwelling-house, under a contract made by him, although the repairs were necessary to prevent immediate and serious injury to the house. The law deems a minor incompetent to make such contracts.

The emancipation by the father makes no difference in this respect. It was the mere renunciation of his own right to the services of the son, but did not enlarge the son’s legal capacity.

According to the agreement of the parties, judgment is to e entered for Webber, for his costs. x

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Mass. 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-wright-mass-1847.