Mason v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.

438 So. 2d 1013, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22464
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 1983·No. No. 82-2405·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We do not believe the trial court erred in concluding by summary judgment that the appellant was not a resident of her mother-in-law’s household in New Jersey at the time appellant was involved in an automobile accident in Florida while appellant was employed and residing with her children in Florida. See Sembric v. Allstate Insurance Company, 434 So.2d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) and Puente v. Arroyo, 366 So.2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co., 438 So. 2d 1013, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22464 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

438 So. 2d 1013 (Mason v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philbin Ex Rel. Edwards v. American States Ins. Co.
729 So. 2d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)