Mason v. United States

193 F.2d 23, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 1, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2854
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1951
Docket10999
StatusPublished
Cited by41 cases

This text of 193 F.2d 23 (Mason v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mason v. United States, 193 F.2d 23, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 1, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2854 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of rape. ' 22 D. C. Code § 2801 (1940). He moved the trial court, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate sentence. The court granted the motion, with concurrence of the prosecuting attorney, but later rescinded the action and denied the motion. This appeal follows.

A careful consideration of the whole record leaves us in serious doubt that appellant enjoyed, in a full sense, due process of law, U.S.Const.Amend. V, especially as regards the right to effective assistance of counsel, U.S.Const.Amend. VI, Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680; Johnson v. Zerbst, 1938, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461; United States v. Wight, 2 Cir., 1949, 176 F.2d 376; Johnson v. United States, 1940, 71 App.D.C. 400, 110 F.2d 562, and the right to testify in his own behalf, 18 U.S.C. § 3481. 1 Deprivation of those fundamental *24 rights goes to the essence of a fair trial and may be reviewed in this proceeding under § 2255. See Meyers v. United States, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 320, 181 F.2d 802, certiorari denied 1950, 339 U.S. 983, 70 S.Ct. 1030, 94 L.Ed. 1387, and cases cited.

We conclude that the order denying the motion should be set aside; that the sentence should be vacated, and that a new trial should be granted. It is

So ordered.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 3481 (Supp. IV, 1951): “In trial of all persons charged with the commission of offenses against the United States and in all proceedings in courts martial and courts of inquiry in any State, District, Possession or Territory, the person charged shall, at his own request, be a competent witness. His failure to make such request shall not create any presumption against him. (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, § 1, 62 Stat. 833. eff. Sept. 1, 1948.)”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proctor v. United States
728 A.2d 1246 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1999)
United States v. Gaines
20 M.J. 668 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1985)
United States v. Grant
473 F. Supp. 720 (D. South Carolina, 1979)
State v. Catanese
368 So. 2d 975 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)
State v. Frazier
252 S.E.2d 39 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1979)
United States v. Mougenel
6 M.J. 589 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Cunningham
370 A.2d 1172 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
United States v. Zeiger
350 F. Supp. 685 (District of Columbia, 1972)
United States v. Paul Nathaniel Hall
396 F.2d 841 (Fourth Circuit, 1968)
Weston v. Henderson
279 F. Supp. 862 (E.D. Tennessee, 1967)
Reddick v. State
190 So. 2d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Elmer Davis, Jr. v. State of North Carolina
339 F.2d 770 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)
Calvin L. Ricks v. United States
334 F.2d 964 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
James W. Killough v. United States
336 F.2d 929 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
Nichols v. State
378 S.W.2d 335 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
United States v. Charles E. McDevitt
328 F.2d 282 (Sixth Circuit, 1964)
Herbert W. Bray v. United States
306 F.2d 743 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)
State v. Arnwine
171 A.2d 124 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
United States v. Killough
193 F. Supp. 905 (District of Columbia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 F.2d 23, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 1, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-united-states-cadc-1951.