Mason v. State

138 S.W.2d 553, 138 Tex. Crim. 654, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 193
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mason v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Tex. Crim. 366
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1940·No. No. 20948.·Published

Opinion

*655 HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for selling whisky in Brown County, Texas, which is alleged to have been dry area; punishment assessed being a fine of $175.00.

The appeal must be dismissed because of a defective recognizance, wherein it is recited that appellant had been convicted of the “offense of selling liquor.” Selling liquor is not an offense unless it be done in dry territory. There is no recital in the recognizance that appellant had been convicted of a misdemeanor as is set out in Article 831, C. C. P.

The same defect appears in this cause as in No. 20,946, I. B. Burns, Sr., v. State, opinion dismissing appeal of this date, and the appeal in the present cause is dismissed for the same reason.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. State, 138 S.W.2d 553, 138 Tex. Crim. 654, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 193 (Tex. 1940).

138 S.W.2d 553 (Mason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.