Mason v. State

251 S.W.3d 379, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 575, 2008 WL 1862634
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 29, 2008
DocketED 89396
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 S.W.3d 379 (Mason v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mason v. State, 251 S.W.3d 379, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 575, 2008 WL 1862634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Mason (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no error and affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Terrell
251 S.W.3d 379 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 S.W.3d 379, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 575, 2008 WL 1862634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mason-v-state-moctapp-2008.