Mason v. State

251 S.W.3d 379, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 575, 2008 WL 1862634
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2008·No. ED 89396·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Mason (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find no error and affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason v. State, 251 S.W.3d 379, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 575, 2008 WL 1862634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

251 S.W.3d 379 (Mason v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Terrell
251 S.W.3d 379 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)